The Daily Stirrer is constantly looking at the news and trying to dig out the stiory behind the story. With latest news that does not make mainstream media and controversial reporting and opinion, we are loking forward to bringing you inside information on the disintegration of the European Union, the replacement of the Petrodollar as global reserve currency, the continuing decay of the USA (unless Trump can neutralise the authoritarian warmongers of the deep state, and we don't think he can) and the ongoing problems caused by the flood of illegal immigrants from the third world to Europe and North America. We certainly do live in Interesting Times.
Daily Stirrer, 2020
Editor's note: The Daily Stirrer believs in the universal right of free speech, this does not mean we necessarily agree with the views expressed by our contributors.
Apologies for erratic posting recently, our main contributors have all been diagnosed as suffering from CCRF and BLMRDS(Chronic COVID reporting syndrome and Black Lives Matter Racism Derangement Sytnrome)
Editor's note: The Daily Stirrer believes in the universal right of free speech, this does not mean we necessarily agree with the views expressed by our contributors.
Apologies for erratic posting recently, our main contributors have all been diagnosed as suffering from CCRF and BLMRDS(Chronic COVID reporting syndrome and Black Lives Matter Racism Derangement Sytnrome)
Vaccine Evil Overlord Bill Gates Admits mRNA ‘Experimental’ Vaccine Will CHANGE Recepient’s DNA
Vaccine evil overlord Bill Gates, who has talked openly of using his Gates Foundation mass vaccination projects to reduce global population, has been caught on video in another uncharacteristically honest moment, admitting that his ‘experimental’ vaccine will CHANGE one’s DNA FOREVER.
He’s experimenting with human beings like we are a test crop of GMO corn or barley!
Bill Gates also stated that up to 700,000 people will likely be maimed or killed by the vaccine. You can read that article here.
Watch his admission below:
The Greatest Criminal Fraud in Medical History: Where’s the Virus?
F. William Engdahl, historian and author, revealed that Dr. Fauci, who has worked at the CDC for 36 years, endorsed the discredited HIV/AIDS “virus” theory that used corrupt science and testing. Roberto A. Giraldo, MD and Etienne de Harven, MD wrote that the major tests used to diagnose AIDS, including the ELISA, Western blot, and the PCR genetic test, are invalid. The doctors wrote, “None of these tests detect the HIV virus itself, nor do they detect HIV particles. The fact that after 25 years of intense research HIV has been neither isolated nor purified in terms of classical virology indicates to us that the infectious view of AIDS as a contagious viral disease is based on an apparently non-existent microbe!” This scenario is playing out again as COVID-19 has yet to be isolated and proven. Suspiciously, the 2006 article by Giraldo and de Harven was suddenly retracted by the journal in 2019 just before the coronavirus Wuhan outbreak.
Fauci and his cohorts, Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House COVID-19 Task Force coordinator, and CDC Director Robert Redfield, are complicit in the HIV/AIDS frauds and malpractice, and today they hold the future of not only American public health, but also of the entire world economy in their hands. Greatest Fraud In Medical History?
Where’s Donald? When 40% of voters cry ‘fraud’ you’ve got a big problemSource: technocracy.news
Technocrat scientists experiment because they can, not because there is a demonstrated need to do so. Genetic splicing between species is becoming more common and accepted. Few are assessing the physical dangers or ethical implications. ? TN Editor
Scientists have made monkeys brains bigger by splicing them with human genes in an experiment reminiscent of The Planet of the Apes.
Experts took the gene known as ARHGAP11B – which directs stem cells in the human brain – and placed it into the brains of common marmosets.
The experiment ended up with the monkey fetuses having larger, more advanced, and more-human like brains, according to the study published in Science.
Scientists however opted to abort the fetus due to possible “unforeseen consequences”.
It echoes the plot of the Planet of the Apes movies series, in which a new race of genetically modified intelligent primates takeover the Earth.
Mankind carries out experiments on apes to make them smarter, only for human society to them collapse as the creatures rise up against them.
Humans are then left living in a primitive and tribal society which is hunted and caged by the very creatures they helped create.
The Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics in Germany and the Central Institute for Experimental Animals in Japan carried out the new experiments.RELATED:
Another 'Scientific Consensus' Turns Out To Be Corporate / Government Scam
So there are no scientists in the world who question the corporate lieOpen Letter from World Scientists to All Governments Concerning Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). The World Scientists Statement dates from 1999. It was superceded by the Independent Science Panel Report in 2003, and by the most recent report Ban GMOs Now in 2013.
'No Monsanto!': Protest Against GMO Food Goes Global
Thousands took to streets across the world’s cities on Saturday to protest the use of GMO products, with Giant Monsanto being the main target. Over 50 countries have been taking part in the march for world food day, and across 47 different US states. Berlin, Strasbourg, Chicago, London, Sydney and Mumbai are just a few of the 500 cities worldwide involved in the rallies, with each one drawing hundreds.
Roundup Weedkiller Linked To Global Epidemic of Fatal Kidney Disease
thousands to die each year from a MYSTERY fatal kidney disease, with evidence pointing THE herbicide Roundup (glyphosate) as the primary culprit. A new study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health proposes a link between the herbicide known as Roundup (aka glyphosate) and a series of mysterious epidemics of fatal ... MORE
The World has Really Been Turned Upside down When We Look To Russia To Defend Our Rights
Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, the land of the free, defends corporate fascism, even when it threatens the future of western civilisation. Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, a nation with a long history of authoritarianism and tyranny, stands up for human rights and putting protection of the environment ahead of corporate power and profit. What's going on?
New Study Shows Toxins In GMOs Are Poisonous To Mammals
More evidence that Gemetically Modified organisms are totally unsuitable to be part of the human or animal food chain. When will the message sink in that our politicians and "experts" who advise them just steal our tax money on behalf of fascist corporations like Monsanto.
Are 90% Of Cancer Research Studies Fraudulent?
A shocking report published in nature magazine has revealed that up to 89% of cancer research studies may be fraudulent. In that many cases the results reported were not reproducable and were in the interests of Pharmaceutical and healthcare corporations rather than cancer sufferers. It is not clear in how many cases the researchers were knowingly dishonest and how many were just stupid ...
Diabetes skyrockets across America as Big Pharma drugs fail yet again
In spite of year on year increases in medication usage rates for preventing and treating Type II diabetes, the condition is becoming more prevalent throughout the U.S.A., according to a new study published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Between 1995 and 2010, the number of people diagnosed with diabetes in nearly half of all the U.S. states more than doubled, ...
Diabetes skyrockets across America as Big Pharma drugs fail yet again
Death By Genocidally Modified Food
The now notorious Monsanto Protection Act, recently passed by the US Congress, which gives biotech corporations, particularly Monsanto immunity from criminal or civil prosecution should harm to humans or the environment arise from ...
Where’s Donald? When 40% of voters cry ‘fraud’ you’ve got a big problemBy Ramin Mazaheri for The Saker Blog and cross-posted with Press TV
I think everybody would like 2020 to be over, and that we’d all like the US election to be over, but journalists shouldn’t stop accurately reporting just because the news is unpleasant.
“Breaking news: Plane lands safely!”
It just doesn’t work that way in life or journalism. We can’t give out participation medals and say it doesn’t really matter who won the US election.
Neither should Bidenites be calling for blacklisting both journalists and Republican public officials or successfully trying to deny Donald Trump a lawyer in Pennsylvania, but that’s another story.
A poll 227 pages long from The Economist – which will likely sink like a stone in the US Mainstream Media because it’s so very damning – reveals total US division and the devastation of its electoral integrity: 9 out of 10 Trump voters say Biden “did not legitimately win the election”, and 9 out of 10 Trump voters say, “mail ballots are being manipulated to favor Joe Biden”.
In good news, only 7 out of 10 Trump voters say that we will,” never know the real outcome of this election.” Is this the new, “Who killed JFK?” (Never getting a clear answer there surely increased political alienation among many Americans.)
Even though I relayed the findings in a manner which stresses political partisanship, this is definitely not a partisan issue: the percentages of Americans who hold the views described above are 45%, 42%, and 41%.RELATED: [Daily Stirrer] ... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Medium.com ]
FEC Chairman Says He Believes 'There Is Voter Fraud' In Key States
As the whole of mainstream media continues to ridicule claims made by President Trump and his supporters of wholesale electoral fraud in the recent US election (where results in many key states have not yet been certified, indeed votes are still being counted in some of those states,) the chairman of the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) has come out of the closet for Trump, stating that he believes there is evidence of widespread voter fraud and other alleged electoral irregularities.
In a recent interview, FEC Chairman Trey Trainor said reports of fraud in some battleground states are credible “otherwise they would allow the [poll] observers to go in,” referring to reports of some polling areas refusing to allow GOP observers to check on the process on Election Day and the days after.
“When you have claims of, you know, 10,000 people who don’t live in the state of Nevada having voted in Nevada, you have the video... they’re (poll workers) either duplicating a spoiled ballot right there or they’re in the process of just marking a ballot that came in blank for a voter. That’s a process that needs to be observed by election observers.”Trainor told Newsmax, Epoch Times reports.
In the interview, he agreed with Trump’s campaign lawsuits, while saying that questionable actions by elections officials in several states could make the election illegitimate. Which makes all those claims by mainstream media that there is no evidence to support Trump's allegation look like a pack of lies.
But there is something else about this election that stinks, several things actually, like the statements from leading Democrats in the weeks before the election about their having a plan to make sure Trump did not win the key states, the way (and this is documented,) that Republican observers were kept from watching the count when US electoral law requires that representatives of all parties are able to observe the process, but is there something in the election system itself that encourages fraud? ”
Yes, two things actually. Dishonesty and corruption; it has been known for decades that the U.S. political system is rotten to the core.. And our old - or should it be new- friend - Artificial Intelligence. Because one of the leading suspects in the fraud is a vote tallying system which is suspected of fliping Trump votes to Biden. And among those who have a financial interest in the company that developed and sells the system are two leading Democrats including the one who announced they had a plan to stop Trump (above) and also bill and Hillary Clinton.
And then there is the question of mail in votes. Postal voting can never be secure, it is an invitation to electoral fraud which is why most countries that have experimented with is quickly abandoned their projects due to problems with vote-fraud (including France, from 1975).
Why do most countries ban mail-in ballots?
Election authorities have concluded the problem with postal voting cannot be fixed.
Why did Britain increase the amount of postal voting, under Tony Blair, when the UK already had a problem with vote-fraud in general, and postal voting in particular? Can the UK have a safe democracy with so many postal votes, when just a tiny number of votes determine the outcome of an election (in 1992 just 1270 votes across eleven constituencies won the Consrevatives a fourth term in government). Perhaps the integrity of UK democracy was not foremost in Tony Blair’s mind.
The UK held their election a year ago. A year before this still-fresh in the memory US election. Boris Johnson's Conservatives won one of the most shambolic elections we have ever had, due mainly to the vast increase in mail in votes. Reports of huge batches of voting papers, all filled in with the same pen and delivered by hand rather than by The Post Office circulated, reports of vote harvesting, particularly among immigrant communities, were rife, boxes full of votes for one candidate were delivered in mystery vans after voting stations had closed, boxes of votes from areas in which the Conservatives or Brexit Party were strong went missing and there were instances of electoral districts in which more votes were cast than there were registered voters to cast them. Any of this sounding familiar?
So while it is justified to ask what the UK can learn from the chaos in the USA, American election authorities should also be asking what could the US have learned from the UK’s farce of an election. On the run up to the election, Dominic Cummings was slipped into Boris Johnson's team as ‘an advisor’ and a sort of digital chief whip who is even less trustworthy than his unpleasant countenance suggests (His Spitting Image puppet depicts him as a Vampire). If this man ever shakes your hand, be sure to count your fingers afterwards.
Cummings was, brought in as an ‘influencer’ to poush through the Brexit deal and votes. His masters were, and are, maths and data. His weapons of choice were -and are- social networks and bots. When he was brought in he made Johnson a promise. Despite Boris looking and sounding increasingly idiotic every time he opened his face, Cummings pledged not only deliver a victory, but to deliver an big majority. And to make such a bold prediction ahead of the game when Corbyn and Labour were doing well it looks even more remarkable. Even to those of us aware of the mood of disillusionment with Labour's metropolital, globalist leadrrship in the party's industrial heartlands, where voters felt "the party of the working class" had abandoned the working class in favour of minorities, globalism and wooing the support of lawyers, academics and the managerial class. It was looking like it would be a close run race until Cummings, with his expertise at using social media, stepped in.
Johnson, Cummings and their party managers all had dirty dealings with Cambridge Analytica. And that company appeared on the radar in 2016 with a similar remit involving the US election. The US and UK are two heads of one body. Ask Iran, Iraq, or Syria. They have the same masters. They share the same goals. They keep each other’s secrets.
Should Cambridge Analytica have used phrases like ”we won” when they are purportedly engaged in social research and have no political identity or party allegiance?
All this does is confirm the suspicion which has finally begun to spread among voters of our great ‘democracies’. That is, that they aren’t democracies at all, elections are a charade, voting is a confidence trick, whoever wins the election, the same people will be pulling strings behind the scenes and the policies implemented will serve the billionaires and global corporations, the banks, lawyers and academics. So what does it mean ? Very likely that those of us who suspect our leaders are chosen for us by the government that we never see or hear of.
If this past 12 months has taught us anything, it’s that no government rules their country or even leads it. They’re like school prefects. They look like they hold power but they’re doing what the school and it’s head master tells them to do. Look at the global covid game. We hear, almost weekly, how much vaccines will cost. How much countries are spending on them. We are told there must be a Great Reset to perpare us for "The New Normal" that we will face after COVID. And yet there is no evidece of the existance of this virus.
In preparation for the "new normal" of global, authoritarian government, countries have been ‘graded’ according to their economies. So in Africa and the undeveloped nations Gates labs will pay less to their vaccine developers working to prepare for the next pandemic than say the UK or France.You can guess who was responsible for the ‘grading’ of course..
But ask yourself what is going on here. A software magnates (actually a patents Magnate - Microsofts success was based on patenting ideas stolen from people who had been happy to put their work in the public domain. ‘Billionaire’ Bil Gates, the man who has never studied economics, politics, or medicine is in charge of all three across the planet right now it seems. Which kind of suggests the world will end up, socially and economically, a big an atrocity as Windows 10.
But no worries, Gate' lack of experience in medicine, finance and economics and the fact that he never wrote a real computer program in his life can be overlooked because he’s a ‘philanthropist’ who ”understands computers and stuff”. And he’s passionate about and ridding the world of diseases and non-billionaires who are- in the words of Gates and his fellow billionaire philanthropists, people such as George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, Jacob Rothschild, Warren Buffet,Jack Dorsey, Michael Bloomberg, ted Turner and Jeff Bezos, and the rest, all of whom seem to get two dollars richer for every dollar they give away - ‘undesirables’.
So, if we’re debating, discussing, arguing or even guessing about the levels of corruption within our world’s great democratic countries, I propose we ask, and then answer for ourselves,then seek the answer the one question that will reveal all you need to know:
Well did you? .................. Now you know why our elections are such a mess these days.[Daily Stirrer] ... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Medium.com ]
NHS Nurse Publicly Resigns & Releases the Real Number of COVID Patients in Her Hospital: ‘I Can’t Lie Anymore’
Source: Summit News
Picture: Screenshot from local TV
An NHS nurse in Britain publicly resigned while wearing her uniform before releasing the real numbers of COVID patients in her hospital and denouncing the government’s disastrous lockdown policy.
The whole of England officially entered lockdown 2.0 today despite numerous experts warning that lockdowns will eventually end up killing more people than coronavirus itself.
A video out of Cornwall shows a nurse in uniform giving a speech explaining why she decided to resign from her job.
NHS Nurse Publicly Resigns & Releases The Real Number Of Covid Patients In Her Hospital 'i Can’t Lie Anymore'
“I don’t need the uniform to prove that I work for them, but today, I’m publicly resigning,” she stated.
The nurse then revealed how she received an email from her bosses demanding an explanation as to why she was being critical of official COVID policy and that people were “reporting” her.
“Unfortunately I can’t lie anymore,” said the nurse, explaining how she took a screenshot of internal hospital data showing there were just three people across three hospitals in the region infected with COVID.
The total deaths from these three hospitals across the last 7 months is just 76 people, roughly 10 deaths a month, according to the nurse, who questioned why it was necessary for her region to go into lockdown given such sparse figures.
“I’ve decided there’s no point, I have gone against the rules within the NHS, I have shared confidential information that people need to see,” said the nurse, adding that other doctors and nurses were trying to speak out.
Matteo Salvini Asks Why Italians Get Lockdowns, Migrants Get ‘Open Ports’from Breitbart Europe
Picture: Albertto Pizzoli, AFP / Getty
The leader of Italy’s Lega party has raged against a double standard whereby Italian citizens are getting “fines and lockdowns” whereas illegal immigrants get “open ports.”
The government of Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte has raised fines to unprecedented levels for those who break the nation’s mask mandate and other new restrictions on personal freedoms, while migrants continue to stream into the country unimpeded on a daily basis, Mr. Salvini complains.
In a Monday morning Facebook post, Salvini notes some 400 migrants arrived from north Africa to the Italian island of Lampedusa on Sunday followed by another three boats with 200 more migrants that landed Monday.
Apparently, the Prime Minister’s health edicts “do not apply” to migrants, Salvini wrote.
The Lega leader has also voiced his opposition to new lockdown measures, insisting that the remedy would be worse than the disease.
“I hope that a new total closure will not be reached because it would be a real economic, social and emotional disaster,” he wrote on Facebook. “Are there any alternatives? Yes, home care because often the remedy risks being worse than the disease.”
In a strange irony, media revealed last Friday that the Tunisian immigrant Brahim Issaoui who stabbed three people to death in the southern French church of Notre Dame while shouting “Allahu akbar” had arrived on the same island of Lampedusa on September 20 before heading north to France where he carried out his attack ... Continue reading >>>[Daily Stirrer] ... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Medium.com ]
Backlash Against Big Tech was a Long Time Coming
William A Jacobson, Newsweek, 20 October
Last week, social media websites prevented users from sharing a bombshell report from the New York Post outlining how the son of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden had personally enriched himself by connecting international interests to the Obama administration. The Post had obtained details about Hunter Biden's business dealings with a Ukrainian energy firm, as well as a library of images depicting his controversial lifestyle and substance abuse, from a computer repair center in Delaware.
In subsequent stories, the public learned of additional credible allegations about Hunter Biden, including that he used his family connections to arrange meetings for Chinese Communist Party officials and business associates with the Obama administration, which his father, then the vice president, attended. All of these demonstrate the very real benefit Hunter Biden, and possibly his father, derived from the political access he enjoyed. As the country approaches election day, such corruption is important for the American voter to consider, especially as Joe Biden pursues the presidency.
Unfortunately, the mainstream media don't seem to agree. Following the publication of the New York Post story, they worked overtime to insist that it could be Russian disinformation for the purposes of election meddling ...Continue reading >>>
Free Speech being superseded by Sharia Law in Germany?In Germany, where the open doors immigration policy insisted upon by Chancellor Merkel has flooded the country with Islamic fundamentalists, Christian activist Heidi Mund was recently charged with “agitation against the people” for speaking our on aspects of Muslim Sharia Law that are unacceptable in western societies (e.g. permitted wife beating, rape, forced marriage.Germany is sliding towards fascism as Hausfrau - Volksfuhrer Merkel outlaws free speech for Christians. All criticism of Islam and discussion of Muslim crimes is hate speech it seems, but the ranting of Islamic hate preachers as they call on Muslims to kill all infidels is acceptable rhetoric.
Why Are Governments Scared Of Truth? France Begins
Crackdown on Conspiracy TheoriesWe reported several weeks ago that the French government was planning a clampdown on conspiray theories by shutting down certain dissident websites. Since then we have learned the French government have shown they are prepared to go even further in attacking citizens right of free speech, they are now shutting down sites that question the government's ability to deal with the immigration crisis, the problem of Islamic extremism, the country's dire economic situation or burgeoning unemployment.
Why Are Governments Scared Of Truth? France Begins Crackdown on Conspiracy Theories
Reporters Without Borders unblocks access to censored websites
It is surprising in view of what we now know about the collaboration between internet technology corporations and government security agencies that many people still think og the internet as a bastion of freedom. This page shows how easy it is for governments and corporations to censor web content. Fortunately there are plenty of libertarians out there (we classical liberals have to call ourselves libertarian since the new, politically correct Stalinists hijacked the word liberal) who will help you find the stuff governments don't want you to see. It is surprising in view of what we now know about the collaboration between internet technology corporations and government security agencies that many people still think of the internet as a bastion of freedom. This page shows how easy it is for governments and corporations to censor web content (and helps you get around the censorship).
Reporters Without Borders unblocks access to censored websites
Facebook labels 2+2=4 “misinformation”
Oct 20, 2020 8:50 PM
On the 5th of October, the WHO’s Dr Michale Ryan claimed “about 10%” of the global population had been infected with Sars-Cov-2. With an alleged death toll of roughly 1 million, that puts the infection-fatality ratio at roughly 0.14%. The maths is not disputable. And yet Facebook has flagged it as “misinformation”.
The Facebook claim is based on an article by Health Feedback, an “independent” fact-checker, which is shoddy, inaccurate and dishonest.
They ignore all the most recent IFR studies. Literally dozens of studies have been done on the IFR of Sars-Cov-2 to this point, many of them published and peer-reviewed in just the last few weeks. The average IFR in these studies has been much lower than 0.68% (usually between 0.1 and 0.2).
The “recent studies” healthfeedback cite are from June at the latest. They also never mention the immunological studies which suggest up to 80% of people may already have mucosal or cellular-based immunity, potentially dropping the IFR even further.
These factcheckers don’t even know how averages work. Health Feedback claim: "the 0.14% IFR estimate fails to account for the extensive IFR variability between populations due to a different distribution of risk factors such as age, ethnicity, access to healthcare, and underlying health conditions in each population."
This is is total nonsense. Of course the IFR accounts for those differences. Some people are more at risk from Covid than others, some people are at almost no risk. The IFR takes those differences into account, and produces an average overall chance of death. That’s how averages work.
This is why I recently suggested that arguing over the finer points of data analysis and any numbers crunched was an exercise in futility. It’s an argument that can’t be won as the figures, the projections and the data have all been false from the beginning because the agenda was to scare the public into handing over their rights in exchange for a rescue package that isn’t really needed. And, of course, we know that much of the data was extracted from hospitals, dishonest doctors and seats of learning who provided the graphs and numbers in exchange for money and immunity from prosecution.Only exposing the truth ( if working within the medical community) is costly. Not only do you receive no blood money, you stop receiving salary and become ostracised by peers ( who are still accepting ‘donations’ to keep up the narrative).
These fact checkers are having to work far too hard to deconstruct a narrative by unpicking numbers.Far too hard. A lie is a lie and a truth is a truth. This is a torturous maths lesson in the name of desperation.And, if they’re so desperate to promote this truth that big money is changing hands, then you can use common sense to work out why.
The conversations should be about incidents that have happened, lies that have been witnessed by the public. Lies either printed in papers available to the public, spoken in public or exposed in public. A little like the Neal Ferguson lies of over a decade ago and repeated 9 months ago for a new narrative. What say you, Fact checkers. Where is that creature now ? He needs to be put on trial. Or has Uncle Bill been greasing the wheels again….
Facebook. A beacon of transparency and entertainment with a CEO who used to be a body double for several Muppet characters and kept Kermit’s voice and intellect.
This is the power of branding . A recognisable brand can say so much. Had the CIA put one of their middle aged psychopaths front and centre to sell Facebook on behalf of their Nazi paymasters, too many people would have perceived the aroma of a rodent.
But had they realised back then that the same CIA had been beavering away on a huge and expensive project to collect the data of as many people on the planet as possible( covertly of course) they may have caught that aroma anyway. . It was called Lifelog. It was abandoned on Feb 4th 2004. Facebook was launched that day. Check it- fact checkers. Then explain the last decades growing mountain of evidence that it’s still stealing people’s privacy and selling it on.Coincidence? Ain’t that a fact..
But the masses saw this innocent dope student who was sold as ‘cool’ because he’d dropped out and invented Facebook ‘for you guys’ to share and meet and make invisible friends.For his trouble he was made a very dull billionaire. He’s had more handlers than Madonna’s knickers.
Google have also joined the party.They refused to remove the ‘youtube’ brand because people love youtube. So it paid to keep the recognisable brand rather than call it CIA tube.
The Nazi’s did it in 45. They realised they had many brand semiotics burned into the global psyche ; all the uniforms and flags and marches.You see those you think Eugenics, Genocide, and world domination. They were a very naughty lot.
In 1945 the Americans rescued them( thanks America) as we all watched the lesser ones hang( check that fact, fact checkers). Their new ‘brand’ is a star spangled banner. They merely write the plans and do the work now .The user-friendly WW2 heroes carry out their plan .A brand you can trust.They kept the Eagle.Business as usual..
Here’s a fact i find relevant to the current obsession with trying to destroy the truth. It involves that other brand people trust – the WHO. The World Health Organisation is really the World Genocide Programme.But that, despite being quite catchy, might have raised an eyebrow or two.So we play along, despite the ‘fact’ that the blood in the veins of this beast is the Gates river of dollars.The very same Gates who wants to murder most of the population so they can grow more daffodils.
Back in the 1970s, the game moved up a few gears. The crazy bastards like Gallo et al were getting a bit too busy with their breeding of old and new viruses and mixing and matching.It was all covert( as regard to the public being aware).But the Governments knew.After all, they enjoyed tens of thousands dying. And if they could do it with out making a racket and breaking things, all the more fun.
In 1972 The World Health Organization (W.H.O.) published a proposal:
“An attempt should be made to ascertain whether viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function, e.g., by …affecting T cell function as opposed to B cell function. The possibility should also be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages more or less selectively the cells responding to the viral antigens.”(Bulletin of the W.H.O., vol. 47, p 257- 274.)
This is a clinical description of the function of the AIDS virus.
There’s a fact to check, Fact checkers.? Mid-1970’s
The incidence of AIDS infections in Africa coincides exactly with the locations of the W.H.O. smallpox vaccination program in the mid-1970’s (London Times, May 11, 1987). Some 1The 4,000 Haitians then on UN secondment to Central Africa were also vaccinated in this campaign.
Knock yourself out, fact checkers.
The virus section of Fort Detrick’s Center for Biological Warfare Research is renamed the Fredrick Cancer Research Facilities and placed under the supervision of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Branding again.Ever see the word ‘cure’ in Cancer Research literature or advertising campaigns before you made a donation? me neither…
Keep your eyes open. The stake are high in this game now.And you can’t get back any time you waste.
Silence the ‘anti-vaxxers’? Enlist celebrities, religious leaders? Bill Gates warns US needs to reduce ‘vaccine hesitancy’
Billionaire software tycoon Bill Gates has urged the US to prepare for a Covid-19 vaccine rollout by deputizing trusted community leaders to “reduce vaccine hesitancy,” bemoaning the rapid spread of “conspiracy theories” online.
The Microsoft founder-turned-vaccine-evangelist painted a mostly rosy picture of a vaccine rollout getting “rich countries” back to normal by the end of 2021 in an interview during the Wall Street Journal’s CEO Council on Tuesday.
However, with less than half of Americans saying they’d get a Covid jab – even if paid $100 for it – in a recent survey, Gates then focused his talk on enlisting the nation’s “trust network” to overcome the skeptics.
As usual the arrogance of Bill Gates prevents him from understanding that as one of the main advocates (and likely benificiaries) of a COVID vaccine, his well documented support for policies like eugenics and population reduction might be a factor in fuelling peole's resistance to a Coronavirus vaccine.We only have to ask people in India, various parts of Africa and other places that have had the dubious benefit of Gates Foundation mass vaccination projects what they thing of Mr. Gates' "philantropy" to understand why so many people are wary of any vaccine this man has anything to do with.
Gates has previously warned that the “final hurdle” to a vaccine-fuelled return to normalcy is convincing the population to actually roll up their sleeves and take the jab(s), and the World Health Organization – of which his foundation is the single largest funder, following the US’ departure – declared “vaccine hesitancy” one of the biggest threats to world health last year. The billionaire has stated he hopes to have seven billion humans vaccinated with whatever formula proves safe and effective, but has suggested a mandate would be counterproductive and actually increase resistance to vaccines.
Lamenting that “vaccine hesitancy is in all countries and predates the pandemic,” Gates suggested American health officials start “thinking about which voices will help reduce the hesitancy, so we can get a level of vaccination that really has a chance of stopping” the virus.
Gates provided the example of challenges the polio vaccine faced in some countries – and the cunning lengths some were willing to go to get their populations jabbed.
The original plan of having a COVID vaccine made mandatory, with those who brefuse it prevented from working, travelling or sending their children to schoool has already been symied which explains why the billionaire has softened his usual authoritarian stance.
The Human Rights Court recently confirmed that Article 8 protects our physical, moral and psychological integrity, as well as our right to choose. Failing to respect someone's competent refusal of medical treatment, and providing treatment against their will, is therefore protected against by Article 8.
It is not clear why a software peddler, and a peddler of shoddy, not-fit-for-purpose software at that, has become the go-to person on global medical issues.All the companies working on this miracle vaccine for a bad cold have already won the NO liability clause from the governments that go along with the hoax. So if you end up a veggie or die or ill . Oh well too bad for you. Just like gates software . If you run it and something happens to the OS that cause monetary damage to you or your company Microsoft is not liable. All computer software has that little gift from TPTBRELATED:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Medium.com ]
Covid-19 testing kits were distributed years before pandemic was declared
What motivated the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a pandemic at the time they did? How much of the pandemonium, governments’ lock downs and corporate control is an overreaction? How much of it was planned? Whose agendas do these lock downs and economic controls ultimately serve? Did you know that covid-19 testing kits were distributed before the pandemic was declared?
A group of 600 medical doctors gathered in Spain and called the covid-19 outbreak “a false pandemic” created for political purposes. Locking people down and convincing them they can spread infections they do not have is a tyrannical curse of oppression. These doctors urge other healthcare professionals, “the media and political authorities to stop this criminal operation, by spreading the truth.” Why are human rights being challenged during a time of human need?
In September 2019, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board released a report titled, ‘A World at Risk’ which detailed how the UN and WHO conduct system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a “lethal respiratory pathogen.” Why did Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates go on record about an impending pandemic, long before one was declared? Why are both these men so adamant about vaccinating the world population?
[Daily Stirrer] ... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Medium.com ]
UK must step up pace on switch to electric or risk car industry?The opening paragraph of the Daily Telegraph's latest paen to the Electric Car reads like the usual uncritical, unrealistic driven written by the amateurish geks the Telegraph passes off as technology journalists. Unfortunately wankers are attracted to technology like flies to shit so it is unreasonable perhaps to expect a tech writer to approch the subject with obectivity and critical analysis, but this? It is just propaganda:
For years they have slumbered while America’s Tesla and electric carmakers in China have raced ahead.
But the giants of European car making have finally woken up to the challenge of electrification – and they are wasting no time.
From Scandinavia to the Rhineland and the plains of south-west France, tens of billions of euros from companies including Volkswagen, BMW, PSA, BASF and others are pouring into a string of ambitious “gigafactories”.
Their goal? To make Europe a green leader in the bulk production of lithium-ion batteries on which the industry’s future depends.
The shift to electric vehicles is already reshaping the global car industry, creating both winners and losers. Like other European countries, Britain has taken a lead by ordering the complete phase out petrol and diesel car sales within 15 years.
But experts warn that if the UK cannot build a domestic supply chain for the batteries that comprise one-third of an electric car’s value, the future for car making in the UK looks bleak. Continue reading >>>
It's time the Telegraph wound up its technology department if this geeky drek is the best they can do. Musk is a con - man and only someone besotted with technology would be blind to that, Tesla Cars only survives by selling shares and taking deposits on advance orders while the waiting time gets longer and longer (and if you think that sounds like a Ponzi scheme, a lot of intelligent investors agree.) And of course they are prohibitively expensive for most drivers.
A couple of weeks ago this paper reviewed a hybrid version of a small Renault, claimed range on batteries - 30 miles, far enough for most commutes the writer added. But reduce that by 50% for normal urban driving conditions and the question is why bother cluttering up a perfectly reasonable small car with batteries, an extra motor and all the associated gadgetry?
It's always the same, when the topic is electric cars, critical thinking goes out of the window. Our generating infrastructure cannot cope with a switch to electric, our distribution grid could not cope with the charging infrastructure needed and if Li-ion batteries are the power source, there are not enough known resources of essential materials for the whole world to switch.
If we replace all of the UK vehicle fleet with EVs, and assuming they use the most resource-frugal next-generation batteries, we would need the following materials:
207,900 tonnes of cobalt – just under twice the annual global production;
264,600 tonnes of lithium carbonate – three-quarters of the world’s production;
at least 7,200 tonnes of neodymium and dysprosium – nearly the entire world production of neodymium;and
2,362,500 tonnes of copper – more than half the world’s production in 2018.
Put simply, we lack the ability to provide the infrastructure required to deliver electric cars and electric heating on the scale required by 2050.”
There is enough oil in the ground worldwide, proven and estimated potential, to last for more than 200 years.
But the climate change eco-falacy is that oil and car emissions are what is driving up the temperature - research into thousands of ice cores going back hundreds of thousands of years shows that rising CO2 levels lag behind temperature increases by about 900-1,000 years, about 900-1,000 years ago there was a worldwide temperature rise - there were no gas guzzlers or HGVs or gas central heating systems around then - but the truth on the fundamental causes of climate change has been beaten into obscurity by eco-radicals and their green agenda.
(The children and adults in the illegal mines digging out the rare earths for the batteries will be delighted when we finally get our green cars that we can't go anywhere in because there is not enough electricity because it's cloudy and the wind has dropped and we are too busy freezing in our all electric homes eating baked beans from the can.
In any case, travel will have been priced out of the range of all but the richest (Soros and his cronies) or the privileged (all our rulers from whichever is on our throne to the vilest tin pot dictator in one of the less white (and therefore much better) countries than ours).
Not to mention that all white male over a certain age will be confined to their homes (or camps for those who have not yet completed their unconscious bias training) so that they cannot parade their white privilege. There will be a sliding scale of restrictions for other whites depending on age and gender (or is it sex?). Better start self identifying as female now guys.)
While idiot Californian politicians might talk of banning I.C.E. vehicles by 2025, the end of oil is more likely 50 years away than 5.
Eliminating fossil fuels to produce electricity or power automobiles would not support life as we know it today but only life as we knew it a century and a half ago. It may also be time to rename the electric cars, beloved by many, to what they really are, coal, natural gas or nuclear powered cars. The emissions are simply shifted from the exhaust pipe to the power station.
It is a mystery that virtually all the electric car owners believe their power comes magically out of a wall socket at home or a charging station on the road. The power really comes from a nearby power plant all of which burn coal, natural gas or obtain heat from nuclear fuel. Even if the plant gets some energy from local wind turbines or solar photovoltaic cells this amount is minimal. If we really want a huge increase in the number of electric automobiles on the road we must build more fossil fuel burning power plants, not more wind or solar farms.
One hundred years ago life was a constant struggle against disease, pollution, deforestation, treacherous working conditions and enormous cultural divides ……. By the end of the 20th century, the world had become a healthier, safer and more productive place, primarily because of fossil fuels bringing electricity to the homes and workplaces of billions of people around the world.
Isn’t it a little strange that a century ago electrification and its fossil fuel source was revered and now so many despise the source but think they can just keep the electricity. No one told them you can not have your cake and eat it too, or that there are no free lunches.
Westminster faces rising discontent over restrictions as it weighs up even tougher lockdown to slow second wave of virus
In the face of a public backlash over continuing restrictions on social activity "to stop the spread of Coronavirus" when everybody knows the vast majority of people are in no danger from the disease and in fact more are now dying due to the effects of lockdown than the virus, the government is now considering even tougher restrictions on social activity among emergency plans to respond to the alarming spread of the second wave. Measures being considered, according to a report leaked to The Times newspaper, includeda two-week shutdown of all pubs, bars and restaurants, as well as indefinite bans on inter-household socializing indoors. Meanwhile, workplaces such as shops, factories and offices would remain open. Whately neither confirmed nor denied the reports in the Times, noting that “we were looking at what we might be able to do.”
The plans have been condemed as unscientific, not backed by credible evidence and indicative of a governmnt committed to authoritarianism. Suorces within the government claim Boris Johnson is facing a rebellion from MPs and rank and file members of the party, with the Labour opposition almost invisible throughout the crisis and recently elected leader Kier Starmer, (we're not saying the man is a plank but if you drove a wooden stake through his chest he'd thing he'd had a heart transplant,) consistently calling for tougher lockdown measures and further economically damaging restrictions on business activity.
Opposition to the government’s introduction of local lockdowns and the reintroduction of social-distancing rules is growing throughoput the country. On Saturday (26 September), thousands of protestors gathered in Trafalgar Square for a ‘We Do Not Consent’ rally, which saw 16 arrested following scuffles with police. The heavy handed policing of the peaceful, lawful protest was in marked contrast to the kid gloves treatmengt haded out to ">Black Lives Matter protests when instead of arresting people for loting and vandalism, half the Metropolitian Police Force got down on their knees and offered to suck black cock.
The government is reportedly considering the introduction of tighter social restrictions in England, as the hyping of the non existent the second wave of infections intensifies, a junior minister has admitted. The whole second wave thing is a fraud of course, the PCR test being used to test increasing numbers of people has been exposed as not - fit - for- purpose as it returns 50% false positive. With that flaw, the more people that are tested, the more positives there will inevitably be.
Speaking on Sky News, Junior Health Minister Helen Whately responded to questions concerning a ‘total social lockdown’ which had been reported in the Times earlier on Monday morning. The ‘social lockdown’ was reportedly presented to the cabinet’s Covid strategy committee last week.
The minister told a questioner “this is the moment when we have an opportunity – we have a choice for the country – to get this back under control.” (which is bollocks, lockdown has failed before, what logic is there in assuming it will succeed now?) Whately also said the government did not want to introduce further restrictions but would be keeping an eye on Covid spread rates across the UK and would act accordingly. The UK has seen a substantial rise in cases over the last fortnight, with 5,693 new cases reported on Sunday; many of the most affected areas are already in a localised lockdown.
Study says UK lockdown linked to thousands of excess deaths
We predicted back in March that lockdowns aimed at halting the spread of coronavirus would only delay the progress of the pandemic rather than eradicating the virus and would likely cause as many early deaths from other causes as it would prevent from COVID - 19. We were called crazy conspiracy theorists and worse of course but once again we are being proved right.
A new study published this weeken reveals government figures now suggest 75,000 excess deaths due to lockdows this years are projected. This means that even as our incompetent, spineless government contemplates taking the advice of lientists and imposing furter restrictions on movenem, more people are dying as a result of lockdown measures that have died from Coronavirus, even if we take the fraudulent figures for COVID deaths at face valuer. Thousands of Britons who suffer heart attacks and strokes are dying at home instead of seeking medical treatment,
Quariantine orders and self isolation advice prompted many people suffering from serious medical conditions to defer seeking medival advice and avoid hospitals, which sensationalised repoprting suggested were overwhemed with coronavirus cases (this unfortunately was fake news, hospitals were half empty,) according to the study’s findings, which were published in the Heart medical journal and first reported by the Daily Mail. The paper noted that deaths from heart disease in private homes surged by 35 percent from March to July, resulting in 2,279 more fatalities than the average over the past six years. However, heart and stroke deaths in hospitals dropped by around 1,400 during the same period, suggesting that some who chose to stay at home would have died anyway. The researchers calculated that in total, 2,085 excess deaths in England and Wales could be linked to heart attack and stroke sufferers who declined or were not able to seek medical assisstance. This means that between March 2 and June 30, every day 17 people died needlessly from heart attacks.
The findings support government figures which underline the disastrous side-effects of the UK’s anti-coronavirus policies.It should be remembered that a study published by the British Medical Journal in May 2020 found that only one-third of excess deaths seen in England and Wales can be linked to coronavirus.RELATED POSTS:
Defund the dons: why we need a new approach to higher education
If universities wish to be political, then they are legitimate objects of political struggle
Back in 1999, Tony Blair, chanting the mantra of "education, education, education, pledge that the Labour government would work towards getting 50% of the young people into university, thus enabling the Britain economy to tap into “the genius of the many” and build a society ready for the oncoming technological revolution, what Blail called 2The Knowledge Economy." Higher education grants for the academically gifted would be replaced by low interest "student loans" to be repaid when, after graduating, the new, university educated masses achieved a certain leval of income.
Last year the government revealed that Blair's target had been met. With the expandsion of higher education has been completed, or as this publication has said before the conversion of higher education to a for profit industry is finished, it is tiome to assess the results and ask whether it has been successful and Blair's dream of The Knowledge Economy is fulfilled. And the answer is that the experiment has turned out not quite as it was supposed to. In fact it has been a disaster, too many graduates with degrees in soft subjects like social science or philosophy, politics and economics, are working as call centre clerks, waiters and waitresses, burger flippers or care office cleaners, (not to mention care workers which is a valuable occu[ation but surely does not require a university degree. The whole thing was a colossal mistake, the question now is how do we go about undoing it.
Let’s start with the money. While the average returns to a degree are positive – British graduates see an increase in net lifetime earnings of about 20% compared to similar non-graduates – they do not tell the full story. Between fees, taxes, interest on loans and lost earnings from three years spent on a combination of drinking, shagging, protesting about things they do not understand, and occasionally attending a lecture for a lark, many undergraduates see a negative return on their degree compared to those who serve modern apprenticeships or train for trades such as plumbing, car medchanics, construction work and so on. While these people forge ahead in the early years, with many vocational occupations with limited career progression opportunities such as nursing and teaching and the police force now being degree entry, many graduates now see their incomes flatlining in the same way as a tradesman.
Students who don’t benefit from their studies pop up everywhere, but a quick look at average outcomes suggest that they’re likely to be concentrated in certain categories. If you look at the income differential of a graduate and a person in a trade,, philosophy, English, and sociology all fall well below the average for a plumber, mechanic, or electrician. It is probably not a coincidence that students working towards degrees in philosophy, English, and sociology are among the most fanatical supporters of socialism.
We have an overproduction of credentials. The bell curve of talent is the same as it ever was, if not shifted down slightly. This is not immediately apparent from the grades graduates receive, with uplifts being given for a poor family background, minority status, personal trauma or disability. If you expand higher education significantly, from the best of the best to the slightly better than middling, you lower the quality of the average student. We would expect the numbers of graduates with lower second degrees to swell. Instead, the proportion of students awarded firsts doubled from 2006 to 2018, while the share getting a 2:2 or below fell 40%.
Universities' budgets, alocated by central government, are based on performance, both the number of degrees awarded and the level of degree are taken into account. It doesn’t take a Nobel prize winning economist therefore to spot the the incentives for universities to soften their standard (if fact as Nobel proze winning economists tend to be absolutely ignorant of how to run a business they'd probable be the last to see the problem.) University income is a function of fees and student numbers. Charging lower fees signals lower quality education. Competition on institutional reputation is already fierce. Marking a little less harshly, though? That can be done. So performance goes up as access widens; academic standards are lowered to accommodate the new average.
The case for defunding the academic community is not just that the sector sells its students short, piling debt onto them as they pursue the illusion of guaranteed career success and higher income. It’s that academia is fundamentally failing to fulfil its mission. The role of Universities is to educate the most academically able of nation’s youth, not everybody is suited to the academic environment however. This does not mean they are stupid, there are different kinds of intelligence and successin formal education is just one of them. It is monstrously unfair to simply abandon those who, though highly intelligent, are not good at passing exams.
However, what universities do not have a mandate for is politicising higher education by upholding and promoting the values of a small elite rather than those of the civilisation and cultures that produced them – a civilisation which many university managements are at pains to emphasise their desire to dismantle. We have recently seen our leading universities involed in attacks on the right to free speech, attempts to rewrite history, prsecution of pupils and staff members who dissent from the 'woke' orthodoxy of the neofascist left and expressing support for organisations whose stated aimes involve destroying capitalism and marginalising white people in white majority nations.
The traditional philosophy of higher education is to allow free enquiry to thrive, producing academics who will pursue the truth without fear of reprisals. What has happened in practice is that state intervention has been rejected but managements have ceded control of research, admissions, extra curricular activities, and the obligation to maintain political impartiality to extremist organisations, while expecting their continued existence to be funded by the taxpayer.
There is no obligation on the taxpayers to accept this. If universities wish to be political, then they are legitimate objects of political struggle. Academia’s status as funded largely without ideological strings attached is not an immutable feature of the world. If we don’t want universities to become the subject of back-and-forth battles between left and right governments then the cleanest way forward is to remove them from the government’s sphere of influence.RELATED POSTS:
Who Should Make Decision About Childrens' Welfare, Parents Or Authoritarian Left Wing Schoolteachers?
We like stories about bureaucrats abusing their authority and about schoolteachers (especiall head teachers) letting their inner fascist out of the closet. So a story than combines both, like this tale of a South Yorkshire primary school head who banned packed lunches because out of concern for 'her' children's welfare she wanted them to have no alternative to the nutrition free slop served by the school kitchen.
Poor white pupils put off school by multicultural timetable
Education, should it be about learning to read, write, spell and calculate? Or should it be about feminism, gay rights, black history and 'gender awareness' whatever that is? For many years we have had multiculturalism and politically correct thinking rammed doiwn pupils throats but noe a study by a local education department suggests this obsession with politicallly corret diversity is responsible for the failure of white working class pupils.
Education, Education, Education And To Hell With The Kids
Teaching used to be a vocation and education a high minded calling for those who wished to prepare young minds for adult life by making the process of learning, in the classroom, by discovery and through osmosis, an exciting and fulfilling lifelong process
The Degree Factory: The Decline Of University Education
The decline of university education in parallel with dumbing down of the general population is contributing to the economic and social problems of the industriaised democracies. But why have standars been allowed to slip so far and can the trend in university education towards theraputic and politically correct courses be reversed?
Facebook censors conservatives and refuses to ban left-wing extremist groups from using their platform to destabilize the countryfrom Natural News
Facebook has vowed to crack down on any attempts by organizations to use their website to interfere with the presidential election. While this has resulted in them taking down the Facebook pages of several anarchist extremist news organizations such as It’s Going Down and CrimethInc., it has so far refused to take action against many other controversial radical leftist pages, like Adbusters and Rose City Antifa.
Rose City Antifa, a Portland-based Antifa organization that was formed in 2007, claims that their goal is to defend Portland against fascism. However, they have a solid reputation for political violence even against regular conservatives. Several Rose City Antifa members have even been accused of beating up Andy Ngo, potentially giving the independent conservative journalist brain damage.
Adbusters a group based out of Canada, is responsible for helping to kick start the Occupy Wall Street riots in 2011. They are currently busy trying to meddle in the elections by organizing a “siege” of the White House, set to begin on Sep. 17 and end after election day.
Despite this, in an interview Zuckerberg said that the platform was actively trying to stamp out violent organizations from their website. “We’re trying to make sure that we do our part to make sure that none of this is organized on Facebook,” he said.
And yet, when presented with an extensive report on the violence perpetrated by Rose City Antifa and other left-wing extremist organizations like it, Facebook has still refused to take action.MORE ON FACEBOOK'S HYPOCRISY AND BLTANT BIAS